Abstract #T478
Section: Ruminant Nutrition
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: General II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: General II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
# T478
Effect of heating method on alteration of protein molecular structure in flaxseed: Relationship with changes in protein subfraction profile and digestion in dairy cows.
Nazir A. Khan1, Helen Booker2, Yajing Ban1, Peiqiang Yu*1, 1Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Key Words: heat processing method, protein molecular structure, protein subfraction
Effect of heating method on alteration of protein molecular structure in flaxseed: Relationship with changes in protein subfraction profile and digestion in dairy cows.
Nazir A. Khan1, Helen Booker2, Yajing Ban1, Peiqiang Yu*1, 1Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
This study evaluated the effect of heating methods on alteration of protein structure in flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) in relation to changes in protein subfraction profile and digestion in dairy cows. Seeds from 2 flaxseed varieties, sampled from 2 replicate plots at 2 locations, were evaluated. The plots (n = 4) were used as replicates. The seeds were either maintained in their raw state or heated in an air-draft oven (dry heating) or autoclave (moist heating) for 60 min at 120°C or by microwave irradiation (MIR) for 5 min. Compared with raw seeds, moist heating decreased (P < 0.05) soluble protein (SP) content (56.5 ± 5.55 to 25.9 ± 6.16% crude protein) and increased (P < 0.05) rumen undegraded protein (RUP) content (36.0 ± 5.19 to 46.9 ± 2.72% CP) and intestinal digestibility of RUP (61.0 ± 2.28 to 63.8 ± 2.67% RUP). Dry heating did not alter (P > 0.05) the protein subfraction profile and rumen degradation kinetics, whereas MIR increased (P < 0.05) the RUP content from 36.0 ± 5.19 to 40.4 ± 4.67% CP. The MIR and dry heating did not alter (P > 0.05) the amide I to amide II ratio, but moist heating decreased (P < 0.05) both the amide I to amide II ratio and α-helix-to-β-sheet ratio. Regression equations based on protein molecular spectral intensities provided high prediction power for estimation of heat-induced changes in SP (R2 = 0.62), RUP (R2 = 0.71), and intestinal digestibility of RUP (R2 = 0.72). Overall, heat-induced changes in protein nutritive value and digestion were strongly associated with heat-induced alteration in protein molecular structures.
Key Words: heat processing method, protein molecular structure, protein subfraction