Abstract #61
Section: Forages and Pastures
Session: Forages and Pastures: Forages for livestock systems
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 9:30 AM–9:45 AM
Location: Suwannee 15
Session: Forages and Pastures: Forages for livestock systems
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 9:30 AM–9:45 AM
Location: Suwannee 15
# 61
Forage-finished steer performance and carcass characteristics from grazing high-energy forages during the finishing period.
Rachel M. Martin*1, Jason E. Rowntree1, Kim A. Cassida1, Joseph Paling1, Douglas Carmichael2, 1Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 2Michigan State University AgBio Lake City Research Center, Lake City, MI.
Key Words: beef, forage-finished, grass-finished
Forage-finished steer performance and carcass characteristics from grazing high-energy forages during the finishing period.
Rachel M. Martin*1, Jason E. Rowntree1, Kim A. Cassida1, Joseph Paling1, Douglas Carmichael2, 1Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 2Michigan State University AgBio Lake City Research Center, Lake City, MI.
The research objective was to compare high-energy forage options during the finishing period for Upper Midwestern forage-finished beef production systems. Twelve 0.80-ha pastures were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 forage treatments including: mixed pasture (MIX); simple cereal grain/brassica mixture (SIMP); and complex cereal grain/brassica mixture (COMP). Red Angus-influenced steers (BW = 439 kg ± 15.6, n = 24) were stratified by BW and randomly assigned to 1 of 12 paddocks and were grazed for a 64 d finishing period. Steers had ad libitum access to water and free choice mineral, and were given access to strips in each grazing treatment. Fasted BW was measured on d 0, 34, and 64. At the end of the finishing period, steers were slaughtered under Federal Inspection and carcass data were collected 48 h post-mortem. Data were analyzed using Proc Mixed (SAS v 9.4) where paddock was the experimental unit. There was a treatment by period interaction for d 64 BW (P < 0.01) where steers on MIX and COMP had greater BW (517 kg ± 8.1 and 514 kg ± 8.1, respectively) than SIMP (490 kg ± 8.1). Steers in MIX and COMP had similar d 0 to 64 BW gains (78 ± 4.3 kg, and 74 ± 4.3 kg), however steers in COMP had greater (P < 0.01) d 34 to 64 BW gains than MIX and SIMP (48 ± 1.6 kg versus 34 ± 1.6 kg and 31 ± 1.6 kg, respectively). Although d 64 BW were similar for COMP and MIX, there was a decided advantage (P < 0.01) for steers in COMP for HCW and dressing percent (295 kg ± 5.6 and 57.29% ± 0.55). Although there were no differences for LM area, marbling score or USDA yield grade, carcasses from steers in COMP had numerically greater means (69.7 ± 2.8 cm2, 483 ± 16.9, and 2.5 ± 0.2, respectively) for each carcass trait when compared with MIX and SIMP. These data indicate that steers grazing MIX and COMP had reasonable gains and carcass merit and these systems can be a viable component of forage-finishing systems in the Upper Midwest.
Key Words: beef, forage-finished, grass-finished