Abstract #626
Section: Ruminant Nutrition
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Protein metabolism
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Tuesday 4:45 PM–5:00 PM
Location: Panzacola H-3
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Protein metabolism
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Tuesday 4:45 PM–5:00 PM
Location: Panzacola H-3
# 626
The Effects of substituting true protein with non-protein nitrogen in Holstein dairy heifers precision-fed different forage to concentrate ratios.
Prabha G. Ranasinghe*1, Noe A. Gomez2, Krystina Rowland1, Ashley Caprio1, Gustavo J. Lascano1, 1Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 2California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA.
Key Words: heifer, true protein, urea
The Effects of substituting true protein with non-protein nitrogen in Holstein dairy heifers precision-fed different forage to concentrate ratios.
Prabha G. Ranasinghe*1, Noe A. Gomez2, Krystina Rowland1, Ashley Caprio1, Gustavo J. Lascano1, 1Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 2California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA.
The objective of this experiment was to determine the effects of feeding different combinations of true protein (TP) and non-protein nitrogen (NPN) when forage to concentrate (F:C) is manipulated on nutrient utilization in precision-fed dairy heifers. Eight ruminally fistulated Holstein heifers (386 ± 9.1 kg BW) were randomly assigned to 2 concentrate levels: HC (25% forage) and LC (75% forage) and to a combination of TP and NPN sequence [U:C; 0% from urea U, 100% casein C (0% U, 100% C; 33% U, 67% C; 67% U, 33% C; 100% U, 0% C)] within concentrate level administered according to a split-plot, 4 × 4 Latin square design (21 d periods). Data were analyzed using the PROC Mixed procedure from SAS. Intake of N was similar and use U and C to provide 1.80 g N/kg BW 0.75. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) apparent digestibility (AD) were positively affected in HC diets (P ≤ 0.05). ADF AD linearly increased (P < 0.01) in HC, and the opposite occurred in the LC group. Fecal N, urine N, and total excreted N were reduced (P ≤ 0.05) in the HC treatment (TRT) which resulted in an increased retained N. No U:C effects were observed in AD of DM, OM, and NDF, but N AD, N (% of intake), N (% of digested) decreased linearly as U level increased (P < 0.05). A quadratic interaction (P < 0.01) was observed; decreasing total excreted N and retained N (g/d) in the HC and the opposite in LC. Total purine derivatives (PD) were positively affected by the HC group (P = 0.04) but did not affect microbial protein flow. There was a positive quadratic (P < 0.01) response in total PD as U increased in both F:C TRT. Protozoa numbers were higher in the HC diets (3.3 × 105 vs. 2.8 × 103; P < 0.01) and increase quadratically (P < 0.01) with U inclusion. No effects for ruminal NH3N between F:C TRT was observed, but there was a linear increase (P < 0.01) as U level increased. Ruminal pH was lower for HC diets (6.3 vs. 6.6) and there was a quadratic interaction as U increased. Nutrient utilization was significantly affected by manipulation of F:C and U:C.
Key Words: heifer, true protein, urea