Abstract #W379
Section: Ruminant Nutrition
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Dairy III
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Dairy III
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
# W379
Dietary supplementation of palm- versus high-linoleic safflower oil to mid-lactating Holstein cows: Intake and milk fat yield.
Shahryar Kargar1, Clayton M. Stoffel2, Lou E. Armentano3, Francisco E. Contreras-Govea*3, 1Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran, 2Papillon Agricultural Co, Easton, MD, 3Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Key Words: palm oil, high-linoleic safflower oil, milk fat
Dietary supplementation of palm- versus high-linoleic safflower oil to mid-lactating Holstein cows: Intake and milk fat yield.
Shahryar Kargar1, Clayton M. Stoffel2, Lou E. Armentano3, Francisco E. Contreras-Govea*3, 1Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran, 2Papillon Agricultural Co, Easton, MD, 3Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Cows were fed diets supplemented with either palm oil (PO, rich in C16:0 and C18:1) or high-linoleic safflower oil (SO, rich in C18:2) at 1.5% of dietary DM. Sixty-four primiparous and multiparous, cows with an average of 100 ± 21.7 DIM, 48.6 ± 10.3 kg milk yield per d, and 657 ± 70.3 kg body weight at trial initiation were fed the 2 diets for 56 d, after a 2-week covariance period. Thirty-two primiparous and multiparous cows were assigned to one diet, and the other 32 cows to the other diet. The experimental design was a randomized complete block, blocking by parity. Cows were housed in a free-stall barn equipped with roughage intake control system gates (Insentec BV, Marknesse, the Netherlands), which recorded individual cow feed intake continuously. Milk yield was measured daily, and milk composition and cow’s body weight were measured weekly. Data were analyzed as a randomized complete block design with diet, parity, week, and interactions as fixed effects, cow as random effect, and week as repeated measurement (SAS Institute, 2003). There was not difference in DMI (26.6 kg/d) and milk yield (46.5 kg/d) between the 2 diets (P > 0.05) but feeding PO instead of SO raised milk fat concentration (3.88 vs. 3.55%) and yield (1.79 vs. 1.65 kg/d) (P < 0.05), but milk protein yield tended (P = 0.10) to increase for PO (1.39 kg/d) than SO (1.36 kg/d). Feeding SO increased trans-C18:1 including trans-6/8, trans-9, trans-10, and trans-12. For cows fed PO vs. SO, yields of de novo (<16 carbons; 447 vs. 412 g/d) and preformed (>16 carbons; 701 vs. 662 g/d) fatty acids were no difference between the 2 diets. Yield of mixed origin fatty acids (C16:0 + C16:1) increased for cows fed PO (515 vs. 379 g/d), possibly due to less inhibition of endogenous synthesis of C16 when feeding less dietary C18:2; as well as providing more exogenous dietary C16 from palm oil. These results confirm the greater milk fat depressing effects of oils containing higher concentration of C18:2, as safflower has, relative to a combination of C18:1 and C16:0 as palm oil.
Key Words: palm oil, high-linoleic safflower oil, milk fat