Abstract #W316
Section: Ruminant Nutrition
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Beef III
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Beef III
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
# W316
Use of virginiamycin in Nellore cattle fed mineral supplement or protein supplement.
Gustavo Rezende Siqueira*1,3, Michele Aparecida Prado Alves2, Paloma Helena Gonçalves2, Ivanna Moraes de Oliveira1, Rodolfo Maciel Fernandes3, Guilherme Felipe Berti2, Fernanda Diamantino dos Santos2, Flávio Dutra de Resende1,3, 1Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Colina, São Paulo, Brazil, 2UNIFEB, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil, 3UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Key Words: additive, supplements, wet season
Use of virginiamycin in Nellore cattle fed mineral supplement or protein supplement.
Gustavo Rezende Siqueira*1,3, Michele Aparecida Prado Alves2, Paloma Helena Gonçalves2, Ivanna Moraes de Oliveira1, Rodolfo Maciel Fernandes3, Guilherme Felipe Berti2, Fernanda Diamantino dos Santos2, Flávio Dutra de Resende1,3, 1Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Colina, São Paulo, Brazil, 2UNIFEB, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil, 3UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of virginiamycin (VM) and the supplementation level on the performance of Nellore cattle in their post-weaning phase grazing on Brachiaria brizantha ‘Marandu’ during the wet season. We hypothesized that VM works on the gram-positive bacteria by inhibiting processes that result in loss of energy, modulating the ruminal fermentation and promoting an improvement in animal performance. The following supplements were utilized in this experiment: mineral (ad libitum) and protein (0.1% of BW), with or without inclusion of VM. The experiment was conducted from January to March 2014, divided into 3 25-d periods. Eighty (80) post-weaning uncastrated Nellore, with an average initial BW of 205.4 ± 21.9 were used in the experiment. Animals were weighed at the end of each period, after a solid food-deprivation period of 16 h. Data were analyzed in randomized blocks with repeated measures over time, in 2 × 2 factorial arrangement in which the factors were the supplements and lack or inclusion of VM. The paddock was considered the experimental unit, with 4 paddocks per treatment (5 animals/paddock). Means were compared by the t-test at 10% probability, and a trend at 15%. There was no interaction between VM and the supplementation level (P = 0.78). It was considered that there was an upward trend of 0.06 kg in ADG for animals fed VM (P = 0.16), which resulted in the increased final BW of the animals fed VM (269.5 vs 264.8; P = 0.09). The protein supplement provided an additional gain of 0.09 kg/day as compared with the mineral supplement, which represented a 11% higher ADG (P = 0.03) and an increase in BW (271.7 vs 262.6; P = 0.01). The highest ADG (P < 0.01) was observed in the first period (1.01 kg), decreasing by 48% in the second period, and increasing by 0.30 kg/day in the third period as compared with the second; this variation was due to the climatic conditions. The use of VM and protein supplement improves animal performance during the wet season. Acknowledgments: Paraíso Nutrição Animal.
Key Words: additive, supplements, wet season