Abstract #W313
Section: Ruminant Nutrition
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Beef III
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Beef III
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
# W313
Performance of grazing Nellore cattle finished with high-intake supplementation.
Flavio Dutra de Resende*1,3, Beatriz Lima Vellini1, Ivanna Moraes de Oliveira1, João Marcos Beltrame Benatti2, Matheus Henrique Moretti2, Rodolfo Maciel Fernandes3, Aline Domingues Moreira3, Gustavo Rezende Siqueira1,3, 1Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Colina, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Trouw Nutrition/Bellman, Mirassol, São Paulo, Brazil, 3UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Key Words: carcass, energy source, forage allowance
Performance of grazing Nellore cattle finished with high-intake supplementation.
Flavio Dutra de Resende*1,3, Beatriz Lima Vellini1, Ivanna Moraes de Oliveira1, João Marcos Beltrame Benatti2, Matheus Henrique Moretti2, Rodolfo Maciel Fernandes3, Aline Domingues Moreira3, Gustavo Rezende Siqueira1,3, 1Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Colina, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Trouw Nutrition/Bellman, Mirassol, São Paulo, Brazil, 3UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
The effects of high intake supplementation on the performance of Nellore cattle finished on Brachiaria brizantha ‘Marandu’ pastures was evaluated. It was hypothesized that the performance Nellore cattle finished under high intake supplementation and with a high forage allowance is improved when corn is used as the source of energy, and that under conditions of low forage allowance, citrus pulp is the most suitable source of energy. Two forage allowances (FA; 2.5 and 4.5 kg DM kg–1 BW) and 2 sources of energy (SE; corn and pulp included in the diet at 2% of the BW) were evaluated. In the experiment, were used 48 (48) uncastrated Nellore cattle at 30 mo of age, with an initial BW of 430.0 ± 2.7 kg. The animals were blocked according to body weight and the data evaluated in randomized blocks in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement (FA and SE). The paddock was considered the experimental unit, with 3 replicates per treatment (4 animals/paddock). There was no interaction between SE and FA (P > 0.10). None of the factors led to any differences (P > 0.10) in carcass yield (58.8%), average daily gain (1.22 kg day–1) or gain yield (carcass gain/weight gain: 805.6 g kg–1). The higher FA resulted in an increase in BW (559.0 kg; P = 0.06) as compared with the animals on lower FA (534.0 kg). However, no difference was detected for carcass gain (0.98 kg day–1; P = 0.28), carcass weight (322.2 kg; P = 0.11), subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT; 4.31 mm; P = 0.24), or loin eye area (LEA; 78.4 cm2; P = 0.49) for the animals under different FA. Corn and pulp did not alter the final BW (546.5 kg; P = 0.19). Contrastingly, the carcass gain (1.02 kg day–1vs 0.93 kg day–1; P = 0.09), the carcass weight (327.6 kg vs 316.8 kg; P = 0.09), and the SFT (4.72 mm vs 3.89 mm; P = 0.18) were greater in the animals fed corn as compared with pulp. Citrus pulp provided animals with a larger LEA (P < 0.01) as compared with corn (81.0 cm2vs 75.8 cm2). It is recommended to use a forage allowance of 4.5 kg DM kg–1 BW and corn as the source of energy. Nutreco/Bellman provided support.
Key Words: carcass, energy source, forage allowance