Abstract #W402
Section: Ruminant Nutrition
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: General III
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: General III
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
# W402
Ruminal hydrogen sulfide concentrations on low-quality grass hay by lambs drinking saline water.
Agustín López*1,3, José I. Arroquy1,2, Ana V. Juárez Sequeira2,3, Nicolás DiLorenzo4, Héctor Fissolo1, María C. Barrionuevo3, 1INTA EEA Santiago del Estero, Santiago del Estero, Argentina, 2CONICET, Santiago del Estero, Argentina, 3FAyA - Univ. Nac. Santiago del Estero, Santiago del Estero, Argentina, 44University of Florida, NFREC, Marianna, FL.
Key Words: sulfate, hydrogen sulfide, protein supplementation
Ruminal hydrogen sulfide concentrations on low-quality grass hay by lambs drinking saline water.
Agustín López*1,3, José I. Arroquy1,2, Ana V. Juárez Sequeira2,3, Nicolás DiLorenzo4, Héctor Fissolo1, María C. Barrionuevo3, 1INTA EEA Santiago del Estero, Santiago del Estero, Argentina, 2CONICET, Santiago del Estero, Argentina, 3FAyA - Univ. Nac. Santiago del Estero, Santiago del Estero, Argentina, 44University of Florida, NFREC, Marianna, FL.
The objective of this study was to determine the impact of protein supplementation on dry matter intake and ruminal hydrogen sulfide concentration ([H2S]) in lambs consuming low-quality tropical grass hay and drinking low salt water (LS) or high salt water (HS). Twenty lambs in individual cages were used in a 10 treatments by 2 period (10 × 2) trial. First factor was water quality (WQ): LS (466 mg/kg TDS) vs. HS (8927 mg/kg TDS of which 6680 mg/kg as sulfates). Second factor was 5 levels of soybean meal (SBM; %BW/d). Water quality × SBM interactions were significant for forage (FOMI; P < 0.05) and total OM intake (TOMI; P < 0.05), but not for water (WI; P = 0.60) and sulfur water intake (SWI; P = 0.14). At the higher levels of SBM (>0.5%) there was no statistical difference for FOMI and TOMI. Water intake was not affected by WQ (P = 0.39) but increased linearly (P < 0.01) in response to SBM. Ruminal H2S concentration was affected by WQ × SBM interaction (P < 0.01). Our results suggest further research is needed on the water quality × protein interaction to understand the mechanisms involved in H2S production, to generate efficient supplementation strategies on low-quality forages.
Table 1. Effects of SBM supplementation and WQ on sulfur water intake (SWI) and ruminal H2S concentration in lambs fed low-quality grass hay
1Means were back transformed.
Water quality | SBM | SWI, mg/kgBW0.75 | H2S (ppm)1 | |
Low salt | 0 | 5.10 | 1.23 (16.98) | |
0.25 | 4.90 | 1.19 (15.49) | ||
0.50 | 5.26 | 1.24 (17.38) | ||
0.75 | 5.79 | 1.20 (15.85) | ||
1 | 6.48 | 1.70 (50.12) | ||
High salt | 0 | 328.67 | 1.59 (38.90) | |
0.25 | 278.49 | 2.69 (489.78) | ||
0.50 | 359.00 | 3.32 (2089.30) | ||
0.75 | 383.06 | 2.99 (977.24) | ||
1 | 454.38 | 2.98 (954.99) | ||
SEM | 33.74 | 0.20 | ||
Effects | P-value | |||
WQ | <0.01 | <0.01 | ||
SBM | 0.20 | <0.01 | ||
WQ × SBM | 0.14 | 0.01 |
Key Words: sulfate, hydrogen sulfide, protein supplementation