Abstract #132
Section: Physiology and Endocrinology
Session: Physiology and Endocrinology: Reproduction and estrous synchronization
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 11:30 AM–11:45 AM
Location: Panzacola H-4
Session: Physiology and Endocrinology: Reproduction and estrous synchronization
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 11:30 AM–11:45 AM
Location: Panzacola H-4
# 132
Timing of GnRH administration based on estrous response in beef cows following administration of the 7-d CO-Synch + CIDR protocol with split-time AI.
Brianne E. Bishop*1, Jordan M. Thomas1, Jillian M. Abel1, Mark R. Ellersieck1, Scott E. Poock1, Michael F. Smith1, David J. Patterson1, 1University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Key Words: estrous synchronization, split-time artificial insemination, beef cow
Timing of GnRH administration based on estrous response in beef cows following administration of the 7-d CO-Synch + CIDR protocol with split-time AI.
Brianne E. Bishop*1, Jordan M. Thomas1, Jillian M. Abel1, Mark R. Ellersieck1, Scott E. Poock1, Michael F. Smith1, David J. Patterson1, 1University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
The experiment was designed to evaluate timing of GnRH administration in beef cows based on estrous status with split-time AI. Estrus was synchronized in 622 cows across 6 locations by using the 7-d CO-Synch + CIDR protocol (100 μg GnRH + CIDR insert [1.38 g progesterone] on d 0; 25 mg PGF2α [PG] at CIDR removal on d 7; and 100 μg GnRH depending on treatment). Estrous detection aids (Estrotect) were applied at CIDR removal and PG on d 7, with estrus recorded at 66 and 90 h after PG on d 10 and 11, respectively. Treatments were balanced across locations; cows within location were randomly assigned to one of 2 treatments based on age, BCS, and days postpartum. Timing of AI was based on expression of estrus 66 h after PG. Cows in each treatment that exhibited estrus by 66 h were inseminated; whereas AI was delayed 24 h until 90 h after PG for cows failing to exhibit estrus by 66 h. Cows in treatment 1 were administered GnRH 66 h after PG irrespective of estrus expression; whereas in treatment 2, cows were administered GnRH coincident with delayed AI only if not detected in estrus at 66 h after PG. Data were analyzed using PROC FREQ in SAS. Treatment affected overall estrous response (1 = 85%; 2 = 90%; P = 0.04) but did not affect total AI pregnancy rate (1 = 58%; 2 = 57%; P = 0.89). There were no differences between treatments in estrous response at 66 h (1 = 73%; 2 = 75%; P = 0.47); and pregnancy rate resulting from AI for cows inseminated at 66 h was not influenced by GnRH (1 = 63%; 2 = 59%; P = 0.50). Estrous response during the 24 h delay period differed between treatments (1 = 45%; 2 = 61% P = 0.04), although AI pregnancy rate for cows inseminated at 90 h did not differ (1 = 44%; 2 = 49%; P = 0.51). In summary, when split-time AI is used in conjunction with the 7 d CO-Synch + CIDR protocol, administration of GnRH at AI to cows that exhibit estrus by 66 h after PG is not warranted. These data indicate that delayed administration of GnRH to 90 h coincident with AI among cows failing to exhibit estrus by 66 h after PG results in a greater overall estrous response.
Key Words: estrous synchronization, split-time artificial insemination, beef cow