Abstract #M125
Section: Forages and Pastures
Session: Forages and Pastures: Silages and forages in dairy production systems
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
Session: Forages and Pastures: Silages and forages in dairy production systems
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
# M125
Effect of processing methods on in situ degradability of maize silage and alfalfa haylage in lactating dairy cows.
Yang Zou*1, Shuangzhao Dong1, Yun Du1, Yajing Wang1, Shengli Li1, Zhijun Cao1, 1State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Key Words: processing method, degradability, lactating cow
Effect of processing methods on in situ degradability of maize silage and alfalfa haylage in lactating dairy cows.
Yang Zou*1, Shuangzhao Dong1, Yun Du1, Yajing Wang1, Shengli Li1, Zhijun Cao1, 1State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
A study using 4 ruminally cannulated Holstein cows was conducted to evaluate the degradability of maize silage and alfalfa haylage prepared by different processing methods. Maize silage (20-mm length) and alfalfa haylage (40-mm length) were either wet (MSW; AHW) or air-dried (MSD; AHD). Air-dried silage and haylage were also ground to pass through a 2.5-mm screen (MSG; AHG). Samples were incubated in the rumen for 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h. Cows were fed ad libitum with free access to water. Treatment MSW had a lower acid detergent fiber (ADF) degradability at 2 h (P < 0.05) compared with air-dried samples (MSD and MSG). Processing methods had significant effects (P < 0.05) on NDF degradability at 72 h, ADF degradability at 36, 48, and 72 h, and ruminal degradable ADF. All of the highest values were observed in AHG treatment (Table 1). Based on this study, processing methods of drying and grinding should be taken into consideration when evaluating nutritive values of forages.
Table1. Degradabilities of NDF and ADF in differently processed maize silage and alfalfa haylage incubated in situ1
a,bMeans with different superscript letters with the same row represent a significant difference between treatments (P < 0.05).
1MSW = wet maize silage, MSD = air-dried maize silage, MSG = air-dried ground maize silage, AHW = wet alfalfa haylage, AHD = air-dried alfalfa haylage, AHG = air-dried ground alfalfa haylage, RDNDF = ruminally degradable NDF, RDADF = ruminally degradable ADF.
Item | Maize silage | P-value | Alfalfa haylage | P-value | ||||
MSW | MSD | MSG | AHW | AHD | AHG | |||
NDF | ||||||||
2 h | 13.72 | 16.68 | 14.48 | 0.31 | 24.62 | 27.76 | 27.81 | 0.30 |
36 h | 40.96 | 41.91 | 39.91 | 0.94 | 50.79 | 46.23 | 51.89 | 0.27 |
48 h | 43.40 | 42.69 | 40.80 | 0.80 | 51.08 | 52.75 | 55.96 | 0.18 |
72 h | 48.58 | 55.20 | 47.31 | 0.28 | 53.68b | 56.54ab | 59.42a | 0.03 |
RDNDF | 31.16 | 34.18 | 29.81 | 0.39 | 41.96 | 42.82 | 44.57 | 0.31 |
ADF | ||||||||
2 h | 12.16b | 14.58ab | 16.17a | 0.09 | 20.61 | 21.50 | 23.91 | 0.54 |
36 h | 41.54 | 41.39 | 51.57 | 0.22 | 41.71ab | 39.26b | 46.68a | 0.04 |
48 h | 44.54 | 45.21 | 43.30 | 0.97 | 46.19b | 47.66b | 53.10a | 0.03 |
72 h | 50.06 | 54.43 | 50.95 | 0.68 | 49.20b | 51.75b | 57.05a | <0.01 |
RDADF | 31.41 | 33.14 | 33.04 | 0.85 | 35.75b | 36.62b | 40.04a | 0.04 |
Key Words: processing method, degradability, lactating cow