Abstract #T444
Section: Ruminant Nutrition
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Dairy II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Dairy II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
# T444
Evaluating carbon and oxygen flux variability and heat production in dairy cows using a portable automated gas quantification system.
Andre B. D. Pereira*1, Andre F. Brito1, Santiago A. Utsumi2, Brianna J. Isenberg1, Kelly S. O'Connor1, 1University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 2Michigan State University, W. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Hickory Corners, MI.
Key Words: carbon emission, oxygen consumption, heat production
Evaluating carbon and oxygen flux variability and heat production in dairy cows using a portable automated gas quantification system.
Andre B. D. Pereira*1, Andre F. Brito1, Santiago A. Utsumi2, Brianna J. Isenberg1, Kelly S. O'Connor1, 1University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 2Michigan State University, W. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Hickory Corners, MI.
The objectives of this study were (1) to evaluate the variability in spot short-term measurements of CO2 (QCO2) CH4 (QCH4) emissions and O2 consumption (QO2), and (2) estimate heat production (HP) from dairy cows fed diets with different RDP and NSC profiles. Eight multiparous and 4 primiparous lactating Holstein cows were blocked by days in milk and milk yield into replicated 4 × 4 Latin squares. Cows received corn silage, grass-legume haylage, roasted soybean, and (1) corn meal and urea (negative control), (2) corn meal, soybean meal, and rumen-protected Lys-Met (positive control), (3) field peas, corn meal, and soybean meal, or (4) field peas, corn meal, soybean meal, and rumen-protected Lys-Met. Gas measurements were performed using a portable automated gas quantification system (Greenfeed, C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD) fitted with sensors for CO2, CH4 and O2. Cows were sampled 3 times daily (about 8 h apart) for 7 d, with sampling points advanced 2 h in the following day to account for diurnal variation of gas flux. Heart rate was monitored for 4 d to calculate QO2/heartbeat (n = 4 cows). Heat production was calculated according to Kaufmann et al. (2011): [(4.96 + 16.07/respiratory quotient) × QCO2]. Filtering of gas sampling by variable head position or low visitation to the gas quantification system (n = 2) resulted in lower number of gas flux points than anticipated (316 valid measurements of 1,008 possible). Each gas sampling lasted, on average, 3.7 min. For all treatments, the within animal CV averaged 25.5% (QCH4), 15.4% (QCO2), and 22.3% (QO2) and the between animal CV averaged 7.0% (QCH4), 4.3% (QCO2), and 5.8% (QCO2). There was no difference between treatments for QCH4 (mean = 373.5 g/d), QCO2 (mean = 6,293 L/d), QO2 (mean = 7,307 L/d), HP (mean = 149 MJ/d), QO2/heartbeat (mean = 66.1 L/heartbeat), and HP/heartbeat (mean = 20.7 MJ/heartbeat). Short-term spot measurements of gas flux can be used to estimate HP in dairy cows. However, sampling rate needs to be optimized, when using the automated gas quantification system, to reduce variability.
Key Words: carbon emission, oxygen consumption, heat production