Abstract #T443
Section: Ruminant Nutrition
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Dairy II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Dairy II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
# T443
Trace mineral variation in dairy forages: Where are the hot spots?
J. R. Knapp*1, W. P. Weiss2, R. T. Ward3, K. R. Perryman4, 1Fox Hollow Consulting LLC, Columbus, OH, 2Dept. of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 3Cumberland Valley Analytical Services, Hagerstown, MD, 4Micronutrients Inc, Indianapolis, IN.
Key Words: copper, zinc, mineral variation
Trace mineral variation in dairy forages: Where are the hot spots?
J. R. Knapp*1, W. P. Weiss2, R. T. Ward3, K. R. Perryman4, 1Fox Hollow Consulting LLC, Columbus, OH, 2Dept. of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 3Cumberland Valley Analytical Services, Hagerstown, MD, 4Micronutrients Inc, Indianapolis, IN.
The objectives of this study were to quantify the variation in trace mineral (TM) concentrations in forages, evaluate the contribution of US geographical location and harvest season to the TM variation, and identify areas where high variation in TM concentrations would preclude using standard reference concentrations. Trace minerals of interest were Cu, Mn, Zn, and Fe. Data from Cumberland Valley Analytical Services covering the period from 2009 to 2014 with concentrations of major nutrients as well as mineral concentrations were used. Data were statistically filtered to remove outliers based on macronutrient concentrations and misidentified feeds before analyses of TM variation. As expected, TM concentrations for corn silage, legume hay, mixed mostly legume (MML) silage, and mixed mostly grass (MMG) silage displayed skewed distributions. TM values were log normalized before ANOVA with location, season, and their interaction as independent effects and total ash concentration as a covariate. Variation in TM concentrations due to location and total ash were significant (P < 0.0001) and the largest sources. Season was often non-significant (P > 0.20), while the interaction between location and season was significant (P < 0.05). Whereas forages in some US locations have consistently low TM concentrations, forages in other areas have both high concentrations and high variation. These results support sampling and analysis of forages and formulation of dairy rations for TM based on analytical results rather than reference values. Recommendations for sampling frequency will vary by location as a function of the observed variation in TM concentrations.
Table 1. Lowest and highest variation in observed Cu and Zn concentrations among U.S. geographical locations, given as median and 5th (p5) to 95th (p95) percentiles in mg/kg
Item | Lowest variation | Highest variation | ||||||||
Median | p5 | p95 | Median | p5 | p95 | |||||
Cu | ||||||||||
Corn silage | 6.0 | 4.9 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 3.2 | 16.4 | ||||
Legume hay | 9.6 | 7.2 | 11.4 | 8.2 | 6.0 | 34.0 | ||||
MML silage | 7.8 | 5.7 | 9.6 | 10.9 | 5.7 | 30.1 | ||||
MMG silage | 8.8 | 6.1 | 9.4 | 7.8 | 4.7 | 37.9 | ||||
Zn | ||||||||||
Corn silage | 23.2 | 21.4 | 28.5 | 26.6 | 15.3 | 60.7 | ||||
Legume hay | 24.0 | 21.1 | 29.5 | 27.8 | 20.9 | 49.2 | ||||
MML silage | 28.3 | 25.8 | 35.0 | 35.7 | 21.8 | 69.7 | ||||
MMG silage | 23.8 | 20.0 | 27.6 | 29.1 | 18.4 | 97.5 |
Key Words: copper, zinc, mineral variation