Abstract #T199

# T199
Effects of canola meal as a source of rumen-undegraded protein on ruminal fermentation using a dual-flow continuous-culture system.
Eduardo Marostegan de Paula*1, Lorrayny Galoro da Silva1, Pedro Del Bianco Benedeti1,2, Hugo Monteiro1,3, Yenling Yeh1, Teshome Shenkoru1, Glen A. Broderick4, Antonio Faciola1, 1University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 2Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil, 3Maringa State University, Maringa, PR, Brazil, 4Broderick Nutrition & Research, Madison, WI.

Previous research indicated that there were significant differences in rumen-undegraded protein (RUP) among canola meals (CM). These differences could influence the nutritional value of CM. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of feeding CM with different RUP on ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestion, and microbial growth using a dual-flow continuous-culture system. Diets were randomly assigned to 6 fermenters in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square with three 10-d experimental periods consisting of 7-d for adaptation and 3-d for sample collection. Treatments were solvent soybean-meal (SBM); low-RUP CM (LCM); and high-RUP CM (HCM). Fermenters were fed 72 g/d, divided in 4 feedings. Diets were prepared as 3 concentrate mixes that were combined with orchardgrass hay and wheat straw. Liquid and solid flow rates were adjusted to 11 and 5.5%/h, respectively. Samples were collected for digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and microbial growth. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS. Orthogonal contrasts were used to compare effects of different protein sources (SBM vs. LCM + HCM), and (LCM vs. HCM). Partial data are presented in the table below. Ruminal NH3-N, total VFA concentration, molar proportion of acetate, propionate, butyrate, and isobutyrate were not affected by treatments. Molar proportion of valerate was greater when SBM was fed, whereas molar proportions of isovalerate, and total BCVFA were lower for CM diets (Table 1). Isovalerate, an intermediate product of leucine degradation, is associated with protein degradation; therefore, this may indicate that CM diets had higher RUP than SBM. Table 1. Effects of feeding canola meals (with different RUP LCM and HCM) on ruminal fermentation
ItemTreatmentSEMContrast P-values
SBMLCMHCMSBM vs. LCM + HCMLCM vs. HCM
NH3-N, g/d0.510.570.530.02NSNS
Total VFA, mmol122.6116.2116.62.54NSNS
Acetate, %64.665.466.51.25NSNS
Propionate, %19.920.721.10.86NSNS
Butyrate, %11.710.99.40.64NSNS
Isobutyrate, %0.440.480.440.02NSNS
Valerate, %1.51.61.60.030.02NS
Isovalerate, %1.31.11.10.080.02NS
Acetate:Propionate3.33.23.20.18NSNS
Total BCVFA, mmol2.11.81.80.110.04NS

Key Words: canola meal, continuous culture, RUP