Abstract #618

# 618
The effect of concentrate allocation strategy on the performance, health and fertility of high-genetic-merit dairy cows offered a grass silage-based diet.
Mark W. Little*1,2, Niamh O'Connell2, Conrad P. Ferris1, 1Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, UK, 2School of Biological Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Few studies have examined the effect of concentrate allocation strategy on the performance high yielding cows (approximately 40 kg/day). This 140-d study (commencing at calving) examined the effect of concentration allocation strategy: group fed (GF) or individual cow fed (ICF) on feed intake, milk production and composition, tissue changes, energy balance, health and fertility of Holstein Friesian dairy cows (n = 72). With GF, cows were offered a total mixed ration comprising grass silage and concentrates (50:50 DM ratio) plus 0.35 kg chopped straw/cow/day throughout the study. With ICF, cows were offered a basal ration consisting of grass silage, concentrates (6 kg/cow/day) and chopped straw (0.35 kg/cow/day), with this diet designed to meet the cows energy requirements for maintenance plus 24 kg milk/cow/day. With this treatment additional concentrates were offered ‘feed-to-yield’ via an out-of-parlor feeding system (0.45 kg concentrate/kg milk) based on each individual cow’s milk yield during the previous week. Production data were analyzed using a Residual Maximum Likelihood (REML) mixed model analysis; fertility and health data were analyzed using generalized linear model regression analysis with the logit link function, using GenStat Version 16.2. Total concentrate intakes were 1616 kg/cow and 1635 kg/cow for GC and ICF, respectively. Neither silage DM intake (P = 0.059) nor total DM intake (22.4(GF), 22.2(ICF) kgDM/day: P = 0.243) was affected by allocation strategy. Similarly, concentrate allocation strategy had no effect on milk yield (39.3 (GF), 38.0 (ICF) kg DM/day: P = 0.113), milk fat content (P = 0.819), milk protein content (P = 0.308), somatic cell score (P = 0.125), BCS loss to nadir (P = 0.521) or mean daily energy balance (P = 0.356). Concentrate allocation strategy has no effect on the numbers of cows with mastitis (P = 0.617), lameness (P = 0.144) or pneumonia (P = 0.451). Cows on the ICF treatment tended to have more abomasal disorders (P = 0.096), and an improved pregnancy rate to first and second service (P = 0.014). Offering concentrates according to milk yield had no effect on cow performance or health, while improving fertility performance.

Key Words: concentrate allocation, performance, fertility