Abstract #120
Section: Nonruminant Nutrition
Session: Nonruminant Nutrition: Enzymes & processing
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 11:15 AM–11:30 AM
Location: Sebastian I-4
Session: Nonruminant Nutrition: Enzymes & processing
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 11:15 AM–11:30 AM
Location: Sebastian I-4
# 120
Effect of water-to-feed ratio on the digestibility of diets fed to growing-finishing pigs.
Cinta Sol*1, Lorena Castillejos1, Ramon Muns1, Josep Gasa1, 1Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Key Words: water-to-feed ratio, growing-finishing pig, nutrient digestibility
Effect of water-to-feed ratio on the digestibility of diets fed to growing-finishing pigs.
Cinta Sol*1, Lorena Castillejos1, Ramon Muns1, Josep Gasa1, 1Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Dilution rates water to feed may affect the apparent total-tract digestibility (ATTD) of barley-wheat diets fed to growing-finishing pigs. The experiment lasted 52 d and it was divided in 2 studies of 26 d each. In the first study 16 female pigs (46.7 ± 1.98 kg of body weight, BW) were individually allotted and assigned to 1 of 4 treatments (n = 4). Treatments consisted in 4 water-to-feed ratios: in dry form (CON), with no added water, and ratios of 0.6:1, 2.1:1 and 2.7:1. In the second study the same animals (65.4 ± 3.14 Kg of BW) were again assigned to 4 new treatments: CON and 1.35:1, 2.7:1 and 3.5:1 ratios. Each pen was provided with a free-choice nipple drinker. Diet was fed close to “ad libitum” trying to avoid refusals, a 0.3% of TiO2 was added to the feed as an indigestible marker and fecal grab samples were collected from the rectum twice a day the 2 last days of each study. Data of ATTD of OM, GE and nutrients were analyzed by one-way ANOVA using the GLM procedure of SAS and differences among mean values were assessed by the Tukey t-test. In the first study, pigs fed diets with ratios 2.1:1 and 2.7:1 had higher organic matter digestibility (OMd) and gross energy digestibility (GEd) than CON (P < 0.05). Pigs fed diets with a ratio of dilution 2.7:1 also had higher (P < 0.05) intake of digestible organic matter (DOMi) and digestible energy (DEi) than pigs fed CON. In the second study, pigs fed water diluted diets (the 3 ratios) had better OMd and GEd than CON (P < 0.05) but no differences were found in DOMi. Compared with CON, the dilution of 3.5:1 also showed a higher (P < 0.05) digestibility coefficients for crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE) and crude fiber (CF) and the dilution 1.35:1 and 2.7:1 also for CF. Using a quadratic regressions approach, the maximum feed OM and GE digestibility coefficient was found with dilution rates of 1.83:1 and 2.70:1 for the first and second study, respectively. In conclusion, the water-to-feed ratio which optimized OM and GE digestibility varies depending on the age of the animals; being lower ratios better for young pigs and higher for finishing pigs. Despite the fact that dilution rates below 2.5–2.7:1 are not usually achieved in liquid feeding commercial farms.
Key Words: water-to-feed ratio, growing-finishing pig, nutrient digestibility