Abstract #T419
Section: Ruminant Nutrition
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Dairy II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Dairy II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
# T419
Meta-analysis of feeding trials to estimate energy requirements of dairy cows under tropical conditions.
André S. Oliveira*1, 1Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Campus Sinop, Sinop, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Key Words: Bos indicus, maintenance, metabolizable energy
Meta-analysis of feeding trials to estimate energy requirements of dairy cows under tropical conditions.
André S. Oliveira*1, 1Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Campus Sinop, Sinop, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
A meta-analysis of feeding trials was conducted to determine the metabolizable energy requirements for the maintenance (MEm) and efficiency of metabolizable energy intake (MEI) for the milk production (kL) of Bos taurus and Bos taurus × Bos indicus crossbreds dairy cows in the tropics. The database contained 236 means treatments from 60 feeding trial studies. The data set was classified by genotype: Bos taurus (37 studies; n = 150 treatments means; MEI = 45.9 ± 6.6 Mcal/d; BW = 570 ± 45 kg; BW variation = 0.30 ± 0.37 kg/d; BCS = 2.7 ± 0.2; milk production = 22.3 ± 5.0 kg/d; milk fat = 3.64 ± 0.37%; milk protein = 3.23 ± 0.25%; milk lactose = 4.43 ± 0.21%; and milk energy = 0.70 ± 0.04 Mcal/kg) and Bos taurus × Bos indicus crossbred (23 studies; n = 86 treatments means; MEI = 31.6 ± 7.2.6 Mcal/d; BW = 487 ± 48 kg; BW variation = 0.07 ± 0.52 kg/d; BCS = 3.2 ± 0.5; milk production = 13.7 ± 2.0 kg/d; milk fat = 3.63 ± 0.55%; milk protein = 3.11 ± 0.28%; milk lactose = 4.49 ± 0.20%; and milk energy = 0.70 ± 0.06 Mcal/kg). A linear regression of MEI (Mcal/kg BW0.75/d) with the milk energy output adjusted to a zero energy balance (EL(0), Mcal/kg BW0.75/d) was fitted using a mixed model with the study as the random effect and the genotype as the fixed effect. The MEm was calculated as the intercept and kL as the reciprocal of the slope of the regression. The dairy cow genotype affected the MEm (P = 0.013) and kL (P = 0.033). Bos taurus MEI (Mcal/kg BW0.75/d) = 0.180 (±0.022, P < 0.001) + 1.546 (±0.153, P < 0.001) × EL(0), R2 = 0.675, MSPE = 0.0007; and Bos taurus × Bos indicus MEI (Mcal/kg BW0.75/d) = 0.147 (±0.024, P < 0.001) + 1.771 (±0.288, P < 0.001) × EL(0),R2 = 0.859, MSPE = 0.0004. Bos taurus × Bos indicus crossbred dairy cows have (P < 0.05) an MEm requirement that is 18% lower (0.147 ± 0.024 vs. 0.180 ± 0.022 Mcal/kg BW0.75/d), but a kL that is 12% lower (0.57 ± 0.09 vs. 0.65 ± 0.06) than that of Bos taurus cows. These results support the hypothesis that Bos taurus × Bos indicus crossbred dairy cows have a lower MEm requirement but lower energetic efficiency for milk production than do Bos taurus dairy cows under tropical conditions.
Key Words: Bos indicus, maintenance, metabolizable energy