Abstract #T183
Section: Forages and Pastures
Session: Forages and Pastures: Silages and forages in beef and sheep production systems
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
Session: Forages and Pastures: Silages and forages in beef and sheep production systems
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
# T183
Nutritional composition of a Musa sp. fodder bank located in the central part of Costa Rica.
Pablo Chacon Hernandez*1, Carlos Boschini Figueroa1, Ricardo Russo Andrade1, 1Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, San José, Costa Rica.
Key Words: fodder bank, Musa, bromatology
Nutritional composition of a Musa sp. fodder bank located in the central part of Costa Rica.
Pablo Chacon Hernandez*1, Carlos Boschini Figueroa1, Ricardo Russo Andrade1, 1Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, San José, Costa Rica.
Bananas are widely grown in tropical areas and a large proportion of the production is related to the pseudo-stem which is not normally utilized. We hypothesized that this material could be used depending on its nutritional quality. Using a completely randomized block design with 3 replicates, the nutritional composition was evaluated on a Musa sp. fodder bank located at the University of Costa Rica’s Alfredo Volio Mata Experimental Station during the rainy season of 2012. Five adult plants were harvested on each block at 20–25 cm above ground and divided into 5 sections for sampling (base, center and tip of the pseudo-stem and blades and petioles of the leaves). For the whole plant mean values of 9.22% of DM, 8.57% of CP, 58.02% of NDF, 37.59% of ADF, 9.25% of LIG, 28.34% of CEL, 20.42% of HEMI, 2.35% of EE, 14.17% of ASH, 6.91% of NDICP and 6.91% of NFC were obtained; also, statistical differences among plant parts were found (P < 0.05). Despite the low dry matter content, banana plant portions may be utilized as ingredient in ruminant diets, especially in areas where the crop is commonly grown. Table 1. Nutritional composition of the Musa sp. plant
a–eStatistical differences in the same row (P < 0.05).
Bromatological composition (%) | Pseudo-stem | Leaves | ||||
Base | Center | Tip | Petiole | Lamina | ||
DM | 3.93e | 4.97d | 6.13c | 10.38b | 20.68a | |
CP | 5.61b | 5.87b | 5.99b | 5.56b | 19.82a | |
NDF | 50.63d | 55.71c | 54.29c | 61.34b | 68.11a | |
ADF | 33.82c | 37.50b | 36.15bc | 44.24a | 36.24bc | |
LIG | 6.84c | 7.57c | 7.15c | 9.90b | 14.79a | |
CEL | 26.98c | 29.94b | 29.01bc | 34.34a | 21.46d | |
HEMI | 16.81c | 18.21b | 18.14b | 17.10bc | 31.86a | |
EE | 1.62b | 1.96b | 2.07b | 1.85b | 4.27a | |
ASH | 19.30a | 16.73b | 13.99c | 11.74d | 9.12e | |
NDICP | 3.83b | 3.72b | 3.83b | 3.89b | 19.26a | |
NFC | 26.68a | 23.45a | 27.49a | 23.41a | 17.96b |
Key Words: fodder bank, Musa, bromatology