Abstract #T351
Section: Ruminant Nutrition
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Beef II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Beef II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
# T351
Effect of monensin inclusion on intake and digestion in Bos indicus and Bos taurus steers consuming bermudagrass hay.
Natasha L. Bell*1,2, Todd R. Callaway3, Robin C. Anderson3, Marcia O. Franco4, Tryon A. Wickersham1, 1Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 2Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, 3Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, College Station, TX, 4Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Key Words: cattle subspecies, ionophore, digestibility
Effect of monensin inclusion on intake and digestion in Bos indicus and Bos taurus steers consuming bermudagrass hay.
Natasha L. Bell*1,2, Todd R. Callaway3, Robin C. Anderson3, Marcia O. Franco4, Tryon A. Wickersham1, 1Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 2Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, 3Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, College Station, TX, 4Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Effects of monensin inclusion and the subspecies of cattle on utilization of bermudagrass hay (13.7% CP) were evaluated using ruminally cannulated steers (5 Bos indicus, BI and 5 Bos taurus, BT; 398 kg BW). Subspecies were concurrently subjected to a 2 period, 2 treatment crossover design. Treatments consisted of 0 (CON) or 200 (MON) mg·hd−1 monensin (Rumensin 90; Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN) fed daily in 0.91 kg DDGS. Steers were group housed during adaptation periods and moved to individual covered pens to facilitate sampling. Periods were 70 d in length: 20 d adaptation, 5 d sample collection, 17 d continuation of treatment application (for ruminal sampling), and 28 d withdrawal between periods. Hay, ort, and fecal grab samples were collected d 21–25 for determination of intake and digestion. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS 9.3 (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC) with terms in the model including treatment, subspecies, subspecies × treatment and period, with animal as a random effect. No subspecies × treatment interactions were observed (P ≥ 0.21). Monensin tended to increase forage OM intake (FOMI; P = 0.08) from 19.5 to 20.3 g/kg BW and total OM intake (TOMI; P = 0.07) from 21.3 to 22.2 g/kg BW. No effect of subspecies (P ≥ 0.16) was observed for FOMI or TOMI. Organic matter digestibility was not affected by monensin (P = 0.97; 60.6 and 60.7 for CON and MON, respectively) and was not different (P = 0.28) between subspecies (58.0 and 63.3% for BI and BT, respectively). When the combined effects of TOMI and OMD were evaluated as total digestible OM intake (TDOMI), no response (P = 0.71) was observed from monensin supplementation. Bos taurus steers had greater (P = 0.04) TDOMI than BI steers (14.3 vs 12.2 g/kg BW). Monensin tended to increase forage NDF intake (FNDFI; P = 0.07) from 16.5 to 17.2 g/kg BW and total NDF intake (TNDFI; P = 0.08) from 17.4 to 18.1 g/kg BW, but had no effect (P ≥ 0.73) on NDF digestibility (NDFD; 66.4 and 66.0% for CON and MON, respectively) or total digestible NDF intake (TDNDFI; 11.7 and 11.9 g/kg BW for CON and MON, respectively). Although FNDFI, TNDFI, and NDFD were not different (P ≥ 0.16) between subspecies, total digestible NDF intake was greater (P = 0.02) for BT than BI steers (12.7 vs 10.9 g/kg BW). Overall, monensin increased FOMI and FNDFI and had no effect on OMD or NDFD. Bos taurus had greater TDOMI and TDNDFI compared with BI steers.
Key Words: cattle subspecies, ionophore, digestibility