Abstract #W60
Section: Beef Species
Session: Beef Species
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
Session: Beef Species
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
# W60
Effects of pre- and post-breeding supplementation of a ruminally protected lipid on subsequent beef cow performance.
Darren D. Henry*1, Francine M. Ciriaco1, Vitor R. G. Mercadante1, Danilo D. Demeterco1, Pedro L. P. Fontes1, Elliot Block2, Neil Michael2, Nicolas DiLorenzo1, G. Cliff Lamb1, 1North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, 2Arm & Hammer Animal Nutrition, Princeton, NJ.
Key Words: ruminally protected, supplementation, beef cow
Effects of pre- and post-breeding supplementation of a ruminally protected lipid on subsequent beef cow performance.
Darren D. Henry*1, Francine M. Ciriaco1, Vitor R. G. Mercadante1, Danilo D. Demeterco1, Pedro L. P. Fontes1, Elliot Block2, Neil Michael2, Nicolas DiLorenzo1, G. Cliff Lamb1, 1North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, 2Arm & Hammer Animal Nutrition, Princeton, NJ.
We determined the effects of supplementation of a ruminally protected lipid (Megalac-R, Church & Dwight Co., Princeton, NJ) on subsequent beef cow reproductive performance. Sixty primiparous cows (428 ± 42 kg of BW) were used in a completely randomized design. Cows were stratified by breed, BCS and the previous year’s calving date, and assigned to one of 2 treatments: control (CTRL; 1.36 kg·d−1 of corn gluten feed) and treatment (MLAC; 1.36 kg·d−1 of corn gluten feed and 0.23 kg·d−1 of Megalac-R). Cows grazed a mixed winter forage pasture of rye (Secale cereale) and ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) and had ad libitum access to water. Supplementation of CTRL and MLAC occurred from 30 d before AI until 7 d post-AI. Daily, cows were individually penned and received their respective supplementation. Cow BW and BCS were recorded 35 and 28 d before AI and 35 and 60 d after AI. At initiation of the breeding season cows were exposed to the 7-d CO-Synch+CIDR ovulation synchronization protocol. Pregnancy was diagnosed on d 30, 60, and 90 after AI. Cows pregnant to AI were monitored until calving to determine length of gestation and calf birth weight. Treatment did not affect (P > 0.05) mean cow BW (491 ± 2.9 kg) or change in cow BW. There was no effect (P > 0.05) of treatment on pregnancy rates to AI (53 ± 0.5%) or at 90 d after AI (94.5 ± 0.5%). Length of gestation was greater (P = 0.0234) for MLAC (285 ± 1.3 d) than for CTRL (281 ± 1.1 d). No effect of treatment was observed for calf birth weight (34 ± 3 kg; P > 0.05). Supplementation of 0.23 kg·d−1 of a ruminally protected lipid to primiparous cows did not enhance subsequent cow reproductive performance.
Key Words: ruminally protected, supplementation, beef cow