Abstract #M41
Section: Animal Health
Session: Animal Health: Beef cattle
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
Session: Animal Health: Beef cattle
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
# M41
A comparison of rumen bacterial communities in bloated and non-bloated cattle grazing alfalfa.
Elnaz Azad*1, Robert Forster2, Surya Acharya2, Tim McAllister2, Ehsan Khafipour1, 1Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, 2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
Key Words: frothy bloat, alfalfa, rumen microbiota
A comparison of rumen bacterial communities in bloated and non-bloated cattle grazing alfalfa.
Elnaz Azad*1, Robert Forster2, Surya Acharya2, Tim McAllister2, Ehsan Khafipour1, 1Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, 2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
To study bacterial shifts during the bloat process, 2 dietary interventions for alleviating the severity of bloat on rumen bacterial composition were studied in 12 rumen-cannulated cattle in a 3-phase crossover study. Cattle were subjected to 1 of 3 treatments: (1) pure alfalfa pasture (PA), (2) pure alfalfa pasture supplemented with Alfasure (AA), and (3) alfalfa/sainfoin mixed pasture (AS). A 7-d washout interval was provided between phases during which cattle received a baseline diet. Rumen liquid and solid fractions were collected from non-bloated (NB; bloat score = 0) and bloated (B; bloat scores = 1–3) cattle within each treatment group and subjected to genomic DNA extraction and Illumina sequencing of the V3-V4 regions of bacterial 16S rRNA gene. On average, 47,211 high-quality sequences were generated per sample. Taxonomic classification revealed the presence of 20 different bacterial phyla among which Bacteroidetes followed by Firmicutes, Fibrobacteres, Cyanobacteria, and Spirochaetes were identified as predominant (>1% of population) members of rumen microbiota. The PERMANOVA analysis of UniFrac distances revealed distinct (P < 0.05) clustering patterns when comparing PA(B), AA(NB) and AS(NB)-associated microbiota. Statistical analysis (LEfSe) of phylogenetic data for rumen liquid and solid fractions also revealed significant associations between several members of microbiota and treatment groups (P < 0.05; Table 1). Further investigation can focus on manipulation of rumen microbiota in favor of increased bloat-resistant functional properties.
Table 1. Association of bacterial genera with treatment groups1
1Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was used to test for significant associations (P < 0.05, and >3 log fold increase in the relative abundance).
2PA(B) = pure alfalfa (bloated); AS(NB) = alfalfa-sainfoin (non-bloated); AA(NB) = alfalfa-Alfasure (non-bloated).
Genus | Phylum | Treatment group2 | ||
Rumen liquid fraction | ||||
Succinivibrio | Proteobacteria | PA(B) | ||
Succiniclasticum | Firmicutes | PA(B) | ||
Butyrivibrio | Firmicutes | AS(NB) | ||
Coprococcus | Firmicutes | AS(NB) | ||
Fibrobacter | Fibrobacteres | AA(NB) | ||
Ruminococcus | Firmicutes | AA(NB) | ||
Rumen solid fraction | ||||
Butyrivibrio | Firmicutes | PA(B) | ||
Streptococcus | Firmicutes | PA(B) | ||
Prevotella | Bacteroidetes | AS(NB) | ||
Fibrobacter | Fibrobacteres | AA(NB) |
Key Words: frothy bloat, alfalfa, rumen microbiota