Abstract #M303
Section: Production, Management and the Environment
Session: Production, Management and the Environment I
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
Session: Production, Management and the Environment I
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Gatlin Ballroom
# M303
Distribution of detected estrus following 14-day CIDR and prostaglandin F2α treatment as a pre-synchronization strategy in dairy heifers.
Courtney K. Claypool*1, Jennifer A. Spencer1, Saulo Menegatti Zoca3, Bahman Shafii1, William J. Price1, Amin Ahmadzadeh1, Neil R. Rimbey2, Joseph C. Dalton2, 1University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 2University of Idaho, Caldwell, ID, 3UNESP, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Key Words: dairy heifer, pre-synchronization, CIDR
Distribution of detected estrus following 14-day CIDR and prostaglandin F2α treatment as a pre-synchronization strategy in dairy heifers.
Courtney K. Claypool*1, Jennifer A. Spencer1, Saulo Menegatti Zoca3, Bahman Shafii1, William J. Price1, Amin Ahmadzadeh1, Neil R. Rimbey2, Joseph C. Dalton2, 1University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 2University of Idaho, Caldwell, ID, 3UNESP, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Pre-synchronization is an effective management strategy in lactating dairy cows to increase the number of animals in estrus and facilitate AI during a desired time interval. However, it is not a strategy often used in nulliparous dairy heifers. The objective was to characterize the distribution of detected estrus following a 14 d CIDR and prostaglandin F2α (PG) treatment as a pre-synchronization strategy in cyclic dairy heifers. Holstein heifers (n = 119) received a CIDR on d −30, and had the CIDR removed 14 d later on d −16. All heifers then received an Estrotect patch and were observed daily to facilitate detection of estrus. Following removal of the CIDR, 115/119 (96.7%) heifers were detected in estrus within 5 d. The proportion of heifers detected in estrus ± SE for each d after CIDR removal was: d 1: 12.6% ± 3% (15/119); d 2: 55.5% ± 5% (66/119); d 3: 18.5% ± 4% (22/119); d 4: 8.4% ± 3% (10/119); d 5: 1.7% ± 1% (2/119). Four heifers were not detected in estrus. Sixteen d after CIDR removal, all heifers received an injection of PG (25 mg i.m.) upon entry to the AI pen (study d 0). All heifers received tail paint and were observed for behavioral estrus daily. Following PG treatment, 114/119 (95.8%) heifers were detected in estrus within 5 d. The proportion of heifers detected in estrus ± SE for each d after PG treatment was: d 1: 3.3% ± 2% (4/119); d 2: 16.0% ± 3% (19/119); d 3: 59.7% ± 5% (71/119); d 4: 16.8% ± 3% (20/119); d 5: 0% (0). Five heifers were not detected in estrus. For the 2 estrus events observed, peak activity was detected 2 d after CIDR removal and 3 d after PG treatment. Pre-synchronization with a 14 d CIDR and PG protocol appears to be an effective strategy to facilitate detection of a high percentage of dairy heifers in estrus.
Key Words: dairy heifer, pre-synchronization, CIDR