Abstract #610
Section: Ruminant Nutrition
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Manipulating rumen function
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Tuesday 3:45 PM–4:00 PM
Location: Panzacola H-2
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Manipulating rumen function
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Tuesday 3:45 PM–4:00 PM
Location: Panzacola H-2
# 610
Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii supplementation during the receiving period on growth efficiency, and behavioral and health responses in newly weaned beef heifers.
Monica L. Jenks*1, Gordon E. Carstens1, Abbey G. Cupples1, Jason E. Sawyer1, William E. Pinchak2, Kerry S. Barling3, E. Chevaux3, 1Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 2Texas A&M AgriLife, Vernon, TX, 3Lallemand Animal Nutrition, Milwaukee, WI.
Key Words: live yeast, morbidity, feeding behavior
Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii supplementation during the receiving period on growth efficiency, and behavioral and health responses in newly weaned beef heifers.
Monica L. Jenks*1, Gordon E. Carstens1, Abbey G. Cupples1, Jason E. Sawyer1, William E. Pinchak2, Kerry S. Barling3, E. Chevaux3, 1Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 2Texas A&M AgriLife, Vernon, TX, 3Lallemand Animal Nutrition, Milwaukee, WI.
Objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of live yeast (LY; Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii strain I-1079; 0.35 × 109 cfu/g ProTernative) supplementation during the receiving period on growth efficiency, feeding behavior, activity and vaginal temperature in 72 newly weaned beef heifers (initial BW of 203 ± 22 kg). Immediately upon weaning, heifers were vaccinated (Pyramid 5) and ship stressed (800 km) before being returning to the research center. Upon arrival, heifers were allotted to 1 of 4 pens each equipped with 3 GrowSafe feed bunks, and pens to 1 of 2 treatments (n = 36) consisting of standard receiving diet (ME 2.36 Mcal/kg, CP 16.5% DM) without LY, and control diet containing LY (5 g ProTernative/kg diet; Lallemand Animal Nutrition). Temperature sensors (iButton) were placed intra-vaginally (CIDR) to record temperature, and HOBO devices attached (hind leg) to measure physical activity for the first 14 d (n = 18). LY treatment did not affect morbidity rate (10.4%), vaginal temperature (39.2 ± 0.2°C), or frequency (16.6 ± 2.2 events/d) and duration (46 ± 5 min/event) of standing bouts. ADG tended (P < 0.1) to be greater for LY heifers during the first 28 d (0.625 vs. 0.432 ± 0.08 kg/d), but was not affected by LY treatment during the 56-d study. LY treatment did not affect DMI, but DMI increased as the study progressed from 2.06 ± 0.22 (first 14 d) to 2.91 ± 0.19% of BW during the 56-d study. LY heifers consumed more (P < 0.05) meals (16.8 vs. 14.6 vs. ± 1.1 events/d) that were shorter (P = 0.08) in length (12.8 vs 14.9 ± 1.2 min/event) and smaller (P < 0.05) in size (0.48 vs 0.55 ± 0.04 kg/event) and at a slower (P < 0.05) meal-eating rate (4.61 vs. 5.54 ± 0.39 g DM/min) compared with control heifers. Moreover, heterogeneities of DMI (SD = 0.59 vs. 0.92 kg/d) and RFI (SD = 0.48 vs. 0.73 kg/d) were less (P < 0.05) in LY than control heifers. While the LY treatment did not affect growth efficiency or health status, supplementation with live-yeast may have favorably affected meal patterns of newly weaned beef heifers.
Key Words: live yeast, morbidity, feeding behavior