Abstract #495
Section: Animal Behavior and Well-Being
Session: Animal Behavior and Well-Being I
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Tuesday 2:30 PM–2:45 PM
Location: Sebastian I-3
Session: Animal Behavior and Well-Being I
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Tuesday 2:30 PM–2:45 PM
Location: Sebastian I-3
# 495
Evaluation of pelleting a feed-through larvicide on dairy calf behavior and fly control.
Randi Black*1, Christa Kurman1, David Paulsen2, Rebecca Trout Fryxell2, Peter Krawczel1, 1Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 2Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
Key Words: dairy calf, larvicide, behavior
Evaluation of pelleting a feed-through larvicide on dairy calf behavior and fly control.
Randi Black*1, Christa Kurman1, David Paulsen2, Rebecca Trout Fryxell2, Peter Krawczel1, 1Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 2Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
Dipteran pests affect dairy calves through rapid transmission of pathogens and reduction in calf well-being. A feed-through larvicide may effectively manage fly pressure and improve well-being. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of pelleting a feed through larvicide on calf lying behavior. Holstein dairy calves (n = 12) were divided into 4 pens and assigned to one of 2 treatment sequences: control (CON)-washout (WAS)-larvicide (LAR) (n = 6) or LAR-WAS-CON (n = 6). CON and LAR lasted 4 d and WAS lasted 10 d. The control pellet was fed during CON and WAS and the experimental pellet was fed during LAR. Dataloggers recorded lying bouts and posture at 1-min intervals from d 0 to d 24. Fecal samples, collected on d 2, 4, 11, 20, and 14, were seeded with house (n = 25), stable (n = 25), face (n = 25), and horn fly eggs (n = 25) to assessed daily emergence of pupae and adults. Data were analyzed using PROC GLM of SAS to determine the effect of treatment period, sequence, and treatment period × sequence interaction. No effects on lying bouts were evident (P ≥ 0.26). Calves laid down longer during CON (17.1 ± 0.2 h/d) and LAR (17.2 ± 0.2 h/d) compared with WAS (14.4 ± 0.1 h/d; P < 0.0001). Further, calves laid down less frequently during WAS (11.6 ± 0.2 bouts/d) compared with CON (16.5 ± 0.4 bouts/d) and LAR (16.0 ± 0.4 bouts/d; P < 0.0001). Calves on the LAR-WAS-CON sequence had a tendency to stand longer (8.0 ± 0.2 h/d) than CON-WAS-LAR sequence calves (7.5 ± 0.2 h/d; P = 0.08). Fewer pupae emerged during the WAS period of the LAR-WAS-CON sequence (5.8 ± 1.5 pupae) compared with CON in CON-WAS-LAR (18.0 ± 1.0 pupae) and LAR-WAS-CON (19.1 ± 1.0 pupae), LAR in CON-WAS-LAR (18.8 ± 1.0 pupae) and LAR-WAS-CON (16.3 ± 1.0 pupae), and WAS in CON-WAS-LAR (13.7 ± 1.5 pupae; P < 0.0001). This indicates there may be a delayed response of larvicide. Further, fewer adults emerged during the LAR period (1.6 ± 0.8 adults) compared with the CON period (7.9 ± 0.8 adults) of the LAR-WAS-CON sequence (P < 0.01). These data suggest a pelleted feed through larvicide may be an effective fly management option for producers without negatively affecting calf behavior.
Key Words: dairy calf, larvicide, behavior