Abstract #447
Section: Physiology and Endocrinology
Session: Physiology and Endocrinology: Reproduction in cattle
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Tuesday 10:45 AM–11:00 AM
Location: Panzacola H-4
Session: Physiology and Endocrinology: Reproduction in cattle
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Tuesday 10:45 AM–11:00 AM
Location: Panzacola H-4
# 447
Evaluating blood perfusion of the corpus luteum in beef cows during fescue toxicosis.
Garrett F. Cline*1, Ashleigh M. Muth-Spurlock1, Benjamin E. Voelz2, Caleb O. Lemley1, Jamie E. Larson1, 1Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 2Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Key Words: blood perfusion, corpus luteum, fescue toxicosis
Evaluating blood perfusion of the corpus luteum in beef cows during fescue toxicosis.
Garrett F. Cline*1, Ashleigh M. Muth-Spurlock1, Benjamin E. Voelz2, Caleb O. Lemley1, Jamie E. Larson1, 1Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 2Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
The aim of this study was to determine if fescue toxicosis altered blood perfusion in the corpus luteum (CL), and peripheral concentrations of progesterone (P4) in cattle. In 2 replicates, the estrous cycles of 36, non-pregnant Angus or Charolais cows were synchronized using the CO-Synch+CIDR protocol. Seven d after initiation of the protocol, cows were assigned (d 0) to 1 of 2 treatments: 2.5 kg of (1) Kentucky-31 endophyte-infected (E+; n = 14), or (2) MaxQ novel endophyte (NE; n = 12) tall fescue seed. On d 7 ovaries were examined using ultrasonography and only cows that had 1 CL present remained on the study (n = 26). Images of blood perfusion of CL, blood samples, rectal temperatures, and blood pressure of tails were collected on d 10, 13, 15 and 18. Images of CL blood perfusion were analyzed using ImageJ software for pixel density, and scored visually (0 to 9 with 0 = no perfusion, 9 = complete perfusion) by 2 independent technicians. The MIXED procedure of SAS was used with day as a repeated measure. LSMeans and pooled SEM are reported. Cows receiving E+ had greater rectal temperatures (P = 0.02; 38.73 ± 0.08°C) than those receiving NE (38.46 ± 0.08°C), providing evidence the cows treated with E+ were influenced by fescue toxicosis. Pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure were decreased (P < 0.01) in cows receiving E+ (54.08 ± 3.21 and 80.06 ± 2.71 mmHg, respectively) than NE (67.12 ± 3.11 and 91.37 ± 2.93 mmHg, respectively). Concentrations of P4 were similar (P = 0.54) between cows receiving E+ (6.04 ± 0.53 ng/mL) or NE (6.36 ± 0.63 ng/mL). Pixel densities (P = 0.14) and visual perfusion scores were similar (P = 0.11) between cows receiving E+ (1,477.20 ± 655.62 pixels and 2.23 ± 0.34, respectively) or NE (2,934.70 ± 718.20 pixels and 3.00 ± 0.36, respectively). Mean CL volume was similar (P = 0.39) between treatments. In conclusion, blood perfusion of CL or peripheral concentrations of P4 were not altered at the onset of fescue toxicosis, indicating that a decrease in blood perfusion of the CL may not be a primary mechanism involved in decreased reproductive efficiency of cattle during fescue toxicosis.
Key Words: blood perfusion, corpus luteum, fescue toxicosis