Abstract #866
Section: Ruminant Nutrition
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Feedlot nutrition
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Thursday 9:30 AM–9:45 AM
Location: Panzacola F-1
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Feedlot nutrition
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Thursday 9:30 AM–9:45 AM
Location: Panzacola F-1
# 866
Effects of chromium propionate in combination with yeast on growth performance and carcass quality of finishing steers.
Cadra L. Van Bibber-Krueger*1, Justin E. Axman1, John M. Gonzalez1, Jim S. Drouillard1, 1Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Key Words: beef cattle, chromium propionate, glucose
Effects of chromium propionate in combination with yeast on growth performance and carcass quality of finishing steers.
Cadra L. Van Bibber-Krueger*1, Justin E. Axman1, John M. Gonzalez1, Jim S. Drouillard1, 1Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
A combination of chromium propionate and yeast supplement (CrY; TruMax, Varied Industries Corp., Mason City, IA) was added to diets of crossbred steers (n = 504; 402 ± 5.8 kg initial BW) to evaluate the effect on feedlot performance and carcass quality. Steers were selected on the basis of initial plasma glucose concentrations ≤6.0 mM, stratified by initial BW, blocked into heavy (H; 420 kg BW) and light (L; 384 kg BW) groups, and assigned to treatments of 0 (CON) or 3.3 g/d CrY (provided 0.5 mg Cr/kg diet DM) with 6 pens/diet within each block. Body weights were measured at 21-d intervals. Finished cattle were weighed and transported to a commercial abattoir where severity of liver abscesses and HCW were collected at harvest, and yield and quality grades, LM area, and 12th rib subcutaneous fat thickness were determined after 36 h of refrigeration. There were no CrY × time × weight block interactions for ADG, DMI, and G:F (P = 0.36; P = 0.49; P = 0.41, respectively), and no CrY × block interactions for ADG and DMI (P = 0.06; P = 0.75, respectively), but a CrY × block interaction (P = 0.03) was observed for G:F; CON-L had poorer efficiency compared with other groups. Yield grade and marbling score tended to be less (P > 0.07) for CrY compared with CON, but other carcass measurements were unaffected by treatment (P > 0.30). Chromium propionate in combination with yeast may improve feed efficiency of lighter cattle, but other effects were minimal.
Table 1. Feedlot performance and carcass traits of steers
1CrY × weight block interaction (P = 0.03).
2CrY × weight block interaction (P = 0.08).
3Effect of CrY (P ≤ 0.08).
4Marbling score determined by camera imaging; Small = 400 to 499.
Item | CON-L | CrY-L | CON-H | CrY-L | SEM |
DMI, kg/d | 12.57 | 12.29 | 13.00 | 12.83 | 0.17 |
ADG, kg/d | 1.70 | 1.76 | 1.88 | 1.84 | 0.03 |
G:F1,3 | 0.1349 | 0.1430 | 0.1445 | 0.1434 | 0.0023 |
HCW, kg | 398 | 400 | 408 | 407 | 3.65 |
LM area, cm2 | 88.13 | 90.06 | 93.10 | 92.97 | 0.96 |
12th rib fat, cm | 1.30 | 1.22 | 1.27 | 1.24 | 0.43 |
Yield grade2,3 | 2.79 | 2.53 | 2.66 | 2.66 | 0.07 |
Marbling score3,4 | 459 | 453 | 430 | 414 | 6.54 |
Key Words: beef cattle, chromium propionate, glucose