Abstract #190

Section: Swine Species
Session: Swine Species
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 10:45 AM–11:00 AM
Location: Sebastian I-3
# 190
Effects of a phytogenic feed additive in a protein-reduced diet in growing/finishing pigs.
Carina Schieder*1, Christiane Schwarz2, Christine Hunger1, Barbara Rueel1, Jose Soto3, Karl Schedle2, 1Biomin Holding GmbH, Herzogenburg, Austria, 2University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Products, and Nutritional Physiology, Vienna, Austria, 3Biomin USA Inc., San Antonio, TX.

The experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a phytogenic feed additive (PFA) on body weight gain, carcass composition and quality of 72 fattening pigs [(Large White × Landrace) × Piétrain)]. Animals were distributed into 3 treatment groups with 3 replicates of 8 pigs per replicate, with an initial weight of 32.2 ± 0.4 kg. Control group (CON) and one phytogenic group (PFA+normal; Digestarom® Finish 150 ppm, BIOMIN Phytogenics GmbH, Germany) received a diet containing 17% and 15% CP in the growing and finishing period, respectively. Another phytogenic group (PFA+low; Digestarom Finish 150 ppm) received a ration with a reduced protein content (−0.4% CP) throughout the whole growing and fattening period. Feed and water was provided ad libitum. At 73.2 ± 0.6 kg of BW, feed changed from growing to finishing diet. Body weight was measured weekly and individual feed intake was recorded daily. Pigs were slaughtered at 117.5 ± 0.2 kg and carcass composition and quality were evaluated. Data were analyzed with procedure GLM (SAS 9.4) and a multiple comparison was conducted with Tukey’s range test. Results for the whole fattening period show significantly improved gain:feed ratio (P < 0.05; 0.389 and 0.388 in PFA+normal and PFA+low, respectively, compared with 0.368 in CON). Average daily feed intake was 2298 g/d in the CON compared with 2288 g/d in the PFA+normal and 2275 g/d in the PFA+low group. Daily weight gain tended to be higher (0.05 < P < 0.10) in the PFA+normal and PFA+low group (889.0 and 881.7 g/d) compared with CON (844.5 g/d). Carcass composition and quality parameters did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) between treatments besides conductivity of meat which has been improved for PFA+low group compared with CON 1 h post mortem (4.35 vs. 5.02 mS/cm, respectively). Overall, the supplementation of a PFA improved the performance of pigs and a protein reduction was efficiently compensated through the supplementation of PFA.

Key Words: fattening pig, nutrient-sparing, phytogenic feed additive